Show Menu

Three More Winners from our Top CBB Handicapper, John Fisher

 
This is a game I have been waiting a while to see. Nova destroyed Xavier at Home the last time these teams met. This was the game that Sumner was knocked out of the game and when G Ryan from Nova went crazy from the three point line. Xavier has the type of team to beat Villanova and at Home I like their chances here. I will go 5 stars here.
xavier +1.5
xavier 73-70

John Fisher Las Vegas, Nevada
WINNER .XAVIER +1.5 exacts revenge with a Home victory 90-83 as G Sumner goes off for 19 points.

There is one title that the NCAA can’t strip away from Louville. It’s the Conference Title. They are looking to stake there claim as best ACC team. They have a tough road to go through but there motivation is there at this point .Louvilles defense is much better then Pittsburgh. When these teams play it’s usually a defensive struggle. Last game they played total just hit 100. Which is worse 1-7Ats on the Road (0-6 conference) for Louville this year or 6-10 ATS for Pitt at Home? I’m also,going to back the Under here as well. Line opened at 136 so will,go 5 stars Louville -1.5 and 3 stars under 134.5

DOUBLE WINNER..GUARANTEE…LOUVILLE -1.5 ..Cardinals controlled the game defensively and had balance scoring on offense to beat a mediocre Pitt team . Hit parlay as well with under 137 with a 67-60 score.

Wake Forest lost to Notre Dame by 23 with Devin Thomas tonight they will lose by more then 8 without him. Notre Dame has the nations most efficient offense and without Thomas playing they told have to worry as much with playing against the Deacoms interior interior defense. Notre Dame would of been a 4.5 point favored but line has jumped to 7 points without Thomas playing. They beat a much better Clemson team by 6 points two weeks ago,today’s task should be easier. 4 stars
Notre dame -7

John Fisher Las Vegas, Nevada
WINNER …NOTRE DAME -7 …The Irish use balance scoring and then the benefit of a poor shooting Wake Forest team to cover and win by DDs 69-58

0.00 avg. rating (0% score) - 0 votes